guests online
Dear readers, the future of this Nocara unfortunately, this ... and this does not bode well.
How to move forward with a majority forced to convene the council after "order" of the minority to change or even cancel unlawful measures and little serious !?!?!?!?
We are dealing with a majority living on the shoulders of the minority, which basically dictates what and how.
For the umpteenth time during the city council Friday, January 14, the majority made its debut in this new year with the now universally known lightness and improvisation, with now known to all the carelessness with which for nearly two years trying to walk this path in the administrative council and mayor sees instead ... lame, lame ... and still limping. Hear hear ...
:
the majority had the courage, courage ... because of evil we have to talk ... he had the courage to put on the agenda:
PURCHASE LAND EX PARISH ASYLUM "- SCHEME APPROVAL OF MINUTES simple agreements .
Dear Readers: It 'SCIENCE FICTION!
You are concerned about buying the building without considering wisely the legal conditions of that: ... there appears to advice without knowing what you speak. It happens that
:
reply minority
Regarding the minutes of simple agreements for the purchase of asylum parish the minority group wants to raise the illogic contained in the report concerned the extent to which it is expressly stated that Diocesan Institute in the appeal against the tax assessments issued to establish ICI, among other reasons also supported NON-OWNERSHIP 'OF SUBJECT PROPERTY TAX , so the non-parish properties of asylum. The minority group
WHY VOTE AGAINST ' THE PROPERTY IS NOT 'THE PROPERTY' THE DIOCESE and asks:
" How does the City of Nocara Diocesan Institute to purchase an asset if the same Institute IS NOT 'THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY PURCHASE? "
Another reason why we are voting against it, that the agreement does not mean that BONARIA then be entered into a public act of buying and selling ... ... ... because the city will never buy this property because it stacked and not owned by the Diocesan Institute for ICI as stated in the applications.
group is invited to majority to want to suspend the decision under review in order to arrange the cards to purchase and after these procedures.
did you know, dear readers, WITH THAT KIND OF SERVICE WE HAVE TO DO ?!?!?!?!?
not mention, for now, the other items on the agenda ... and I leave to you the necessary comments on the case.
Dear readers, the future of this Nocara unfortunately, this ... and this does not bode well.
How to move forward with a majority forced to convene the council after "order" of the minority to change or even cancel unlawful measures and little serious !?!?!?!?
We are dealing with a majority living on the shoulders of the minority, which basically dictates what and how.
For the umpteenth time during the city council Friday, January 14, the majority made its debut in this new year with the now universally known lightness and improvisation, with now known to all the carelessness with which for nearly two years trying to walk this path in the administrative council and mayor sees instead ... lame, lame ... and still limping. Hear hear ...
:
the majority had the courage, courage ... because of evil we have to talk ... he had the courage to put on the agenda:
PURCHASE LAND EX PARISH ASYLUM "- SCHEME APPROVAL OF MINUTES simple agreements .
Dear Readers: It 'SCIENCE FICTION!
You are concerned about buying the building without considering wisely the legal conditions of that: ... there appears to advice without knowing what you speak. It happens that
:
reply minority
Regarding the minutes of simple agreements for the purchase of asylum parish the minority group wants to raise the illogic contained in the report concerned the extent to which it is expressly stated that Diocesan Institute in the appeal against the tax assessments issued to establish ICI, among other reasons also supported NON-OWNERSHIP 'OF SUBJECT PROPERTY TAX , so the non-parish properties of asylum. The minority group
WHY VOTE AGAINST ' THE PROPERTY IS NOT 'THE PROPERTY' THE DIOCESE and asks:
" How does the City of Nocara Diocesan Institute to purchase an asset if the same Institute IS NOT 'THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY PURCHASE? "
Another reason why we are voting against it, that the agreement does not mean that BONARIA then be entered into a public act of buying and selling ... ... ... because the city will never buy this property because it stacked and not owned by the Diocesan Institute for ICI as stated in the applications.
group is invited to majority to want to suspend the decision under review in order to arrange the cards to purchase and after these procedures.
did you know, dear readers, WITH THAT KIND OF SERVICE WE HAVE TO DO ?!?!?!?!?
not mention, for now, the other items on the agenda ... and I leave to you the necessary comments on the case.
the building in question
next time and thanks for being more numerous and active.
0 comments:
Post a Comment